Legal Opinion

Emerich v. City of Indianapolis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1889No. 14,826PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellant was convicted of violating an ordinance of the city of Indianapolis by selling intoxicating liquor without having obtained a license from the municipal authorities. In the superior court, to which the case went by appeal from the mayor’s court, an answer was filed by the appellant wherein it is alleged that his place of business is outside of the corporate limits of the city, but within two miles thereof; that it is in the township of Wayne and within two miles of the corporate limits of the town of Haughville; that he is a resident of Wayne township, and not of the township of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hedderich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Lutz v. City of CrawfordsvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. City of Frankfort v. AugheIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shea v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Schmidt v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Sopher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. City of Indianapolis v. BielerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State ex rel. Kelley v. BonnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API