Legal Opinion

Kraus v. Wisconsin Life Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The grace period for payment of the September 14th premium ran out less than three months after the disability of insured began. The company takes the position that the disability rider, by its terms, calls for waiver of premium after total and presumably permanent disability has continued for three months and proofs thereof have been filed with and approved by the company. It contends that because the disability in this case had not continued for three months before expiration of the grace period, the September 14th premium was not waived, and since it had not been paid, the policy was not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Himelbloom v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co. v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  3. Schlintz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Winkelmann, Etc. v. Central States Life Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. RTE Corp. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Gerrard Realty Corp. v. American States InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Marion v. ORSON'S CAMERA CENTERS, INC.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Marion v. Orson's Camera Centers, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Kraus v. Wisconsin Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API