Legal Opinion
Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. v. ACE Property & Casualty Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 10, 2007No. M-82 (HB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
BAER, District Judge.
Petitioner Munich Reinsurance Company of America (“Munich Re”) filed a Petition for the Appointment of an Umpire in connection with a pending arbitration with Respondent ACE Property & Casualty Insurance Company (“ACE”). ACE argues that such appointment would be improper at this time in light of the civil action in Pennsylvania which seeks disqualification of Munich Re’s counsel, Saul Ewing, on the basis of a conflict of interest. Munich Re’s petition is DENIED.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND/PROCEDURAL POSTURE
Munich Re (America) is a reinsurance company with its…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Northwestern National Insurance v. Insco, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Simply Fit of North America, Inc. v. PoynerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Canfield v. SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Robert J. Herrera v. Santangelo Law Offices, P.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2022
- Troika Media Group, Inc. v. StephensonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019