Legal Opinion

Egan v. Kieferdorf

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 15, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from judgment of the Fourth Judicial District Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action was to recover $200 brokerage for procuring a loan of $20,000 at 1 per cent., for three years, on premises in West íwenty-second street, this city, owned by defendant.

It clearly appears that plaintiff’s assignor was employed to obtain a loan; that the defendant agreed to pay him $200 for his services; and that the Fayerweather estate, represented by Arnoux, Eitch & Woodford, agreed to make the loan, and would have made it but for the fact that there were three judgments unsatisfied of record against the defendant, and her house encroached three and one-half inches on adjoining…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Moses v. . BierlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. Doty v. MillerNew York Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Smithers v. SteinerThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chambers v. AckleyNew York Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Pretzfelder v. StrobelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API