Legal Opinion

Pretzfelder v. Strobel

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1896Published

Appeal by defendants from judgment of the Ninth Judicial District Oourt,

1Opinion of the Court

McAdam, J.,

The plaintiff, a real -estate broker, sues to recover $220, being 1 per cent, commission on procuring a loan secured by first mortgage on property in East Sixteenth street, this city, belonging to the defendants.

The action proceeded upon the theory that the defendants were partners, and that there was a joint- employment by them of the plaintiff to perform the' services- rendered. There is no' proof, however, that the defendants were partners, other than an admission testified to have been made by Strobel that Neuseh was his partner, a declaration which does not charge the latter,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People's Bank v. St. Anthony's Roman Catholic ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Day v. . Town of New LotsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Goodsell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. McPherson v. RathboneNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  5. Corning v. Troy Iron & Nail FactoryNew York Supreme Court · 1862

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API