Legal Opinion
Heredia v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 31, 1995No. 94 CIV. 3179 (MGC)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CEDARBAUM, District Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq., for injuries suffered by plaintiff in an automobile accident. The United States moves to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim under the FTCA. For the reasons discussed below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part.
Background
Plaintiff Antonio Heredia was an eighteen year-old high school student and a participant in the Marine Corps’ “Delayed Entry Program.” The Delayed Entry…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Riviello v. WaldronNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Sheridan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sheehan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amusement Industry, Inc. v. SternDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Old Republic Insurance v. Hansa World Cargo Service, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- STMicroelectronics v. Credit Suisse GroupDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Presley v. Jackson Municipal Airport AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2000
- Craig v. Sandals Resorts InternationalDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.