Legal Opinion

W. Creekmore Wallace, II v. State of Oklahoma

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 14, 1983No. 80-1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, W. Creekmore Wallace, II, filed this suit alleging that defendant, the State of Oklahoma, has acted unconstitutionally in denying him attorneys’ fees. The district court dismissed because it lacked subject matter jurisdiction and because the Eleventh Amendment barred the action, and plaintiff appeals. We affirm on the ground that the Eleventh Amendment bars the action.

I

The factual background

The facts as stated in the district court’s order of dismissal are as follows. 1 Plaintiff is an attorney practicing in the State of Oklahoma. In 1974, the District Court…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Hans v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Great Northern Life Insurance Co. v. ReadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. Florida Nursing Home Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Seibert v. State Of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. Daniel v. American Board of Emergency MedicineDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
  3. Seibert v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Health Sciences CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  4. Gressley v. DeutschDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1994
  5. Romco, Ltd. v. Outdoor Aluminum, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API