Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Calhoun

California Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1955No. L. A. 22987Published

1DissentTraynor, J.

I dissent.

The interpretation placed upon the relevant statutes by the majority opinion results in consequences totally at variance with the objective of making the relationship between adoptive parents and their adopted child as close to the natural relationship as possible. (See Adoption of McDonald, 43 Cal.2d 447, 459 [274 P.2d 860]; In re Santos, 185 Cal. 127, 130 [195 P. 1055]; 2 Armstrong California Family Law, 1242-1243.) Children who have been raised together as brothers and sisters are set against one another whenever intestate succession from another than their parent is involved,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Sontheimer v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Estate of WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Darling v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Estate of JobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API