Marco Antonio Carrasca Fidel Figueroa Abimael Figueroa Rigoberto Vales Barreras v. Edward Pomeroy and Steve Losey, in Their Individual Capacities
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
While the incidents that form the basis of this claim may seem trivial at first, to the Plaintiffs who were subjected to them they presented a paradigmatic case of racial profiling. The parties testified to differing versions of the relevant facts. The District Court failed to view the facts in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs and accordingly erred in granting summary judgment based on qualified immunity and the merits.
I
Introduction
Plaintiffs. Marco Antonio Carrasca, Fidel Figueroa, Abimael Figueroa, and Rigoberto Vales Barreras filed suit…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Montoya De HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Richard J. Kautz v. Met-Pro CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Julia Ann Glanzman v. Metropolitan Management Corporation Julia A. Glanzman, Joseph W. Fries v. Metropolitan Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Thore v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Gibson v. Superintendent Of New Jersey Department Of Law And Public Safety-Division Of State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Smith v. Borough of DunmoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.