Commonwealth v. Marchesano
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This appeal is from the judgment of sentence imposed after the revocation of appellant’s probation. Appellant contends that he was denied his right to a speedy revocation hearing, and that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to assert that claim at the probation revocation hearing. We agree with appellant that trial counsel was ineffective and, for the reasons that follow, remand the case for an eviden-tiary hearing.
Appellant was sentenced to two years probation for burglary on June 3, 1982. On December 29,1983, in Montgomery County, appellant was arrested for and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MarchesanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. BischofSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Vereen v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Goods v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.