Legal Opinion

National Bank v. Newheart

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

This cause coining on for adjudication upon a rehearing thereof heretofore granted, and it appearing to the court that the decree appealed from is a joint decree against the only appellant before the court and several others who are- not made parties to the appeal except by the use of the abbreviation “et al.,” which is ineffectual, and that said several omitted parties are necessary parties appellant,.and can not now be brought in as parties appellant because the time has expired in which they can take an appeal, it is, therefore, ordered that the appeal in said cause be, and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dolner v. The MonticelloU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1870
  2. State ex rel. Andreu v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  3. Whitlock v. WillardSupreme Court of Florida · 1881
  4. Cornell v. FranklinSupreme Court of Florida · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Vincent v. HinesSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Clark v. RosenwaldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Brooks v. Miami Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. Walker Fert. Co., Inc. v. RaceSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  5. Lessic ex rel. Floyd v. BooskeSupreme Court of Florida · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API