Legal Opinion

Wilbur v. Portland Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 10, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

Paragraph First of the will of Joseph L. B. Coveil late of Portland reads as follows: “I give, devise and bequeath to The Portland Trust Company the sum of $18,000. in trust, however, for the following purposes:—To invest and reinvest and to pay over the income and as much or all of the principal as they may deem necessary, it to be the sole judge, to Warren Lodge F. A. & A. M. of Portland, Connecticut, in recognition of the honor bestowed upon me as Master.” Subsequent paragraphs made three other pecuniary bequests, but no attempt was made to dispose of any residuary estate. The named…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. BarberIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Connecticut Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. HollisterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  3. Bates v. SpoonerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
  4. Wilson v. D'AtroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  5. Flanner v. FellowsIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Garrison v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Hill v. BirminghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. BrodySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. Second National Bank v. Harris Trust & Savings BankConnecticut Superior Court · 1971
  5. McClary v. McClaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API