Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

Ronald Smith (Parolee) appeals from an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) denying Parolee’s administrative appeal of a parole revocation decision.

While on parole, Parolee was charged with three technical parole violations and a new arrest.1 Although the new criminal charges were dismissed, a violation hearing was held, at which Parolee admitted to committing the three parole violations. Consequently, the Board found Parolee delinquent, revoked his parole and recommitted Parolee to serve nine months backtime.

Parolee, acting pro se, petitioned the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Bronson v. Commonwealth Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Cudo v. Hallstead Foundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Miller v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Sheets v. Commonwealth, Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pana v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API