Little v. Lichkoff
Supreme Court of Alabama
Eeom: Circuit Court of Tuscaloosa. Tried before tbe Hon. S. H. Bpeott. Action by Sam Lichkoff against John Little and others to recover damages for the breach of an attachment bond, alleging that the attachment had been wrongfully and vexa-tionsly sued out.
Read the full summary
Eeom: Circuit Court of Tuscaloosa. Tried before tbe Hon. S. H. Bpeott. Action by Sam Lichkoff against John Little and others to recover damages for the breach of an attachment bond, alleging that the attachment had been wrongfully and vexa-tionsly sued out. The testimony for plaintiff tended to show that prior to and at the time of the levy of the attachment he was a merchant doing business in the city of Tuscaloosa; that before the levy of the attachment his credit was good, but since that time it was destroyed; and that by reason of the levy of the attachment his stock of goods, which was…
1Opinion of the Court
HARALSON, J
1. The plaintiff in the court below, ap-pellee here, being examined as a witness- in his own behalf, was asked by his counsel, to state the total amounts due him by each person indebted to him, at the time of the levy of the attachment on his stock of goods; and, to refresh his memory, he was allowed to examine his ledger as to entries of indebtedness. After an examination of them, he stated, that the entries had been made by him, or by his book-keeper, under his direction, in the usual course of his business as a merchant, and he had personal knowledge of their correctness; and he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brigham & Co. v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Pollock & Co. v. GanttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Union Refining Co. v. BartonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Young & Co. v. CuretonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Stoudenmire v. Harper Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1886
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mobile Light & R. R. v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Louisville Jeans Clothing Co. v. LischkoffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895