Legal Opinion
State v. Rose
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 2, 1975PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselee, J.
The defendants were found guilty by a jury of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (2). They have appealed from the judgment rendered on the verdict and have presented twelve issues in their preliminary statement of appeal but have relied on three issues in their brief.
The defendants claim error in that part of the court’s charge relating to its instructions on § 53a-134 (a) (2), particularly in submitting the issue of whether either one, or both, of the defendants was armed with a deadly weapon. The applicable portion of the statute at the time of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. RallsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- State v. TropianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- State v. AnnunziatoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. RoqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. RuizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.