Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. . McGee

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 28, 1938PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partStacy, C. J.

This is a criminal action in which the defendant was tried under a bill of indictment charging the defendant with the unlawful possession of nontax paid liquor for the purpose of sale. Officers went to the premises of the defendant, took him into custody and searched his dwelling house and outbuildings. They found about twenty gallons of whiskey. There were 19 pint bottles, a 15-gallon keg, two one-gallon kegs and some fruit jars, all containing nontax paid liquor. There was a verdict of guilty. From judgment pronounced thereon defendant appealed. The defendant does not contend that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mallett v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. State v. . GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  3. State v. . MallettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. S. v. . WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. State v. Thompson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. AccorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. . ElderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API