Legal Opinion
Rent Stabilization Ass'n of New York City, Inc. v. Dinkins
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 8, 1992No. 91 Civ. 4386 (LLS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
STANTON, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
Plaintiff Rent Stabilization Association brings this action on behalf of its members to challenge certain provisions of the New York City Rent Stabilization Law, and the rent stabilization regulations of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, as an unconstitutional taking 1 and denial of due process 2 in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
BACKGROUND
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rent Stabilization Ass'n of City of New York v. DinkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. New York State Division of Housing and Community RenewalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Pharmaceutical Research v. Stuart WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
- Rent Stabilization Association Of The City Of New York v. DinkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- 335-7 LLC v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021