Legal Opinion

Orlando Crespo Muriel v. U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 16, 2005No. 05-12791Unpublished

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Orlando Crespo Muriel (“Muriel”), his wife Carmen Crespo, and his stepson Marco A. Tavares Gallego (collectively “petitioners”), seek review of the final order of the Bureau of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the decision of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”), which denied their petitions for asylum, withholding of removal, and for relief under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). After review, we dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction to the extent it seeks review of the BIA’s February 10, 2005 final order. We deny the petition to the extent it seeks…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Abdul Hakeem v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Jose Irineo Gonzalez-Oropeza, Guadalupe Garcia-Pineda v. U.S. Attorney General, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API