Legal Opinion

Hurdle v. White

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1977No. 761SC997PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The question presented by this appeal is whether the check was a sufficient memorandum of the contract to meet the requirements of our statute of frauds, G.S. 22-2, which provides that “[a]ll contracts to sell or convey any lands . . . shall be void unless said contract, or some memorandum or note thereof, be put in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith . . . .” We hold that under the facts of this case the check endorsed by White was a sufficient memorandum of the contract, and accordingly we reverse the judgment dismissing plaintiff’s action.

A memorandum, by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Lane v. CoeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Bateman v. . HopkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Lewis v. . MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Harper v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Brooks Distributing Co., Inc. v. PughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. House v. StokesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Maurice v. Hatterasman Motel Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Hanson v. LEGASUS OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API