Merrick v. Street
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
Appellee, Sam Street, brought suit against John F. Merrick, alleging that Merrick was his employer and that Merrick at the time appellee received injuries in the course of his employment was then employing three or more persons, and therefore was subject to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Vernon’s Ann. Civ.St. art. 8306 et seq.), under which appellee sues. But appellee alleged that appellant did not carry insurance, and, therefore, he sued under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Law covering such cases.
The case was tried to the court without a jury,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HarringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Lerer v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gulf Paving Co. v. LofstedtTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Pacific Indemnity Company v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Harmon v. RaineySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- Gonzalez v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Prewitt v. WallerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.