Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lucy Clark v. Michael Rosenthal, Kevin McClanahan

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided May 14, 2026No. 6:26-cv-01109Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS LUCY CLARK, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 26-1109-JWB-BGS MICHAEL ROSENTHAL, KEVIN MCCLANAHAN, Defendants. MEMORANDUM & ORDER Plaintiff Lucy Clark filed this action pro se.1 The Complaint consumes one page and names two Defendants, Michael Rosenthal and Kevin McClanahan. (Doc. 1.) The allegations are minimal and are comprised of three sentences: 1. Defendant Kevin Mcclanahan [sic] violated due process, 2. Defendant Michael Rosenthal conspired with Kevin Mcclanahan [sic], 2. [sic] Plaintiff demands an award to be decided by the Court. (Id.)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Garrett v. Selby Connor Maddux & JanerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  5. Montoya v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API