Stanrail Corp. v. Unemployment Insurance Review Board
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge
Thomas Pierce’s employment was terminated by Stanrail Corporation and he thereafter applied for unemployment benefits. An intake examiner and later an administrative law judge (ALJ) determined that Pierce was terminated for just cause, and he was thereby denied unemployment benefits. Pierce appealed to the Unemployment Insurance Review Board (the Board), which reversed the ALJ and held that Pierce was not terminated for just cause, and he therefore was entitled to unemployment benefits. We address the following issue, which is dispositive of the appeal:
Did the Board…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barnett v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Jeffboat, Inc. v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Love v. Heritage House Convalescent CenterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Parkison v. James River Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Kentucky Truck Sales, Inc. v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Abdirizak v. REVIEW BD. IND. DEPT. OF WORK. DEV.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Giovanoni v. Review Board of Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Employer v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Beckingham v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Beckingham v. Review Board of the Indiana Department of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.