Legal Opinion

Spann v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1985No. C5-84-1847PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY OPINION

LESLIE, Judge.

FACTS

Defendant-appellant was charged with two counts of burglary. Appellant’s trial counsel advised his client he believed appellant had a criminal history score of four. Appellant disagreed with that computation and contacted his probation officer. The probation officer, by telephone, informed appellant the score appeared to be three and appellant relayed that information to his counsel.

Appellant pleaded guilty to burglary in the third degree. Based on a history score of three, appellant’s presumptive sentence would be 21 months, stayed. Appellant signed a plea…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. State v. BensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. FerraroCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Kennedy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Lallier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Lallier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. FerraroCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API