People v. Pagni
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The defendant was convicted in the superior court of Sacramento County of the crime of having in his possession a certain quantity of intoxicating liquor for beverage and not for sacramental or medicinal purposes, and he appeals from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The information, in addition to charging that the accused, in the month of June, 1923, had in his possession intoxicating liquor of the interdicted alcoholic content, set up two alleged prior convictions of the defendant of a like charge, as follows, to wit: 1. That the said Pagni, before…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- MedleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Moore v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. ChenaultCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. MullalyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- People v. RuddickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.