Legal Opinion

State v. Bowen

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 23, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

Stephen and Larry Bowen, brothers, were separately indicted for the sale of a single quantity of cannabis. 22 M.R.S.A. § 2384. The indictments were consolidated for trial. 1 Defendants waived jury trial 2 and, after hearing, both were convicted and have appealed. We deny each appeal.

I

The professed purchaser of the cannabis was the principal prosecution witness. His mother was called as a defense witness and her direct examination was, in part, as follows:

“Q Has he [State’s witness] ever lied to you?

Yes. >

About important matters ? iO

Yes. >

Such as criminal activity ? ©

Yes. >

Q…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. State v. GervaisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  3. State v. HansonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  4. State v. RyderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  5. State v. TurnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grady v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. State of Maine v. Abdirahmon A. AbdullahiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
  3. State v. PottleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. State v. CunninghamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  5. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API