Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Marshall

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Upon the death of their mother, plaintiff and defendant Alfred Marshall inherited an undivided one-half interest in certain lake property. On February 17, 1934, the two met in Chicago to1 discuss means of paying plaintiff’s *509bills for the reason that his creditors were then pressing him. As a result of the meeting it was agreed that plaintiff should execute a deed to his one-half interest of the lake property to Alfred. No consideration was paid for this deed. There was a dispute whether this deed was for the purpose of obtaining credit from the brother to enable plaintiff to pay his debts or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Karr v. WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Goodell v. BlumerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Chapin v. PeaseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1834
  4. Harvey v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. First National Bank v. BertschyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Angers v. SabatinelliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Campbell v. DrozdowiczWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API