Irene Sahulka v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
This case arises out a suit brought by Irene Sahulka against Lucent Technologies, Inc. (Lucent), pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, alleging that Lucent wrongfully refused to pay the plaintiff discretionary death benefits under the AT & T 1 Pension Plan (Plan) following the death of her husband. Mrs. Sahulka appeals the district court’s 2 grant of summary judgment to Lucent and the court’s exclusion of certain evidence submitted by the appellant. We affirm the district court’s judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
The appellant’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gloria Pagan v. Nynex Pension Plan and Nynex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Beverly D. Woo v. Deluxe Corp., Hartford Life Insurance Co., Doing Business as Itt Hartford, Inc., Sued as Hartford Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Abnathya v. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Alton Cash v. Wal-Mart Group Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Herbert Ferrari, M.D. v. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Everett E. McGarrah v. Hartford Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Terry Clapp v. Citibank, N.A. Disability Plan (501)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Ragsdale v. Wolverine WorldwideCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Lisa Gerhardt v. Liberty Life Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.