Legal Opinion
People v. Gidaly
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 18, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
35 Cal.App.2d Supp. 758 (1939)
THE PEOPLE, Respondent,
v.
CHARLES GIDALY et al.,Appellants.
California Court of Appeals.
July 18, 1939.
Rosecrans & Emme, Bayard R. Rountree, James M. Carter and John C. Packard for Appellants.
Gallagher, Wirin & Johnson, as Amici Curiae, on Behalf of Appellants.
Ray L. Chesebro, City Attorney, W. Joseph McFarland, Assistant City Attorney, and John L. Bland, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent.
Shaw, P. J.
These two appeals were argued together, they involve different provisions of the same ordinance and some of the points made are applicable to both appeals, so we…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 3 v. Utah Labor Relations BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1949
- Rees v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Church v. PayneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939