Legal Opinion

State v. Sexton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1995No. WD 49298PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STITH, Judge.

This ease involves the admission of testimony of uncharged sexual misconduct in the 1994 trial of John D. Sexton on one count of rape and five counts of sodomy. Mr. Sexton was found guilty by the jury and sentenced to consecutive prison terms totalling forty years. The State admits that the admission of evidence of prior sexual misconduct to show the defendant’s propensity to commit the crime constituted error under State v. Bernard, 849 S.W.2d 10, 16-17 (Mo. banc 1993). The State argues that remand for a new trial on all issues is unnecessary, however, because the same evidence…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GrimSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. State v. BernardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. State v. ShilkettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  5. State v. BelkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. John Sexton v. Mike KemnaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  2. State v. McNaughtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. GilyardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  4. State v. SextonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. StacyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API