Legal Opinion

John Sexton v. Mike Kemna

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 29, 2002No. 00-2764PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOKEN, Circuit Judge.

Missouri inmate John Sexton appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Sexton argues that the state courts violated North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 89 S.Ct. 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656 (1969), by imposing the same forty-year sentence for fewer counts of conviction after Sexton successfully appealed his initial conviction. He further argues the evidence was constitutionally insufficient to convict him of sodomy, he was denied his constitutional right to confront the victim at trial, and he was denied effective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Anthony Williams v. Michael Bowersox, Superintendent, PccCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  2. Douglas Colvin v. Lynda TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  3. Willie Simmons v. Allen Luebbers, Willie Simmons v. Al LuebbersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. Mark D. Whitehead v. David Dormire, Superintendent JcccCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  5. Cvijetinovic v. EberlinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API