Legal Opinion

Bayers v. Bongfeldt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1938No. 31,281PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Action for damages arising out of an automobile collision. Defendant counterclaimed for damages to his car. The jury found for defendant on plaintiff’s action and for plaintiff on defendant’s counterclaim. Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for new trial.

The collision occurred about 8:45 in the morning of October 1, 1935, at the right-angle intersection of state highway No. 101 and Sixth avenue north, in Hennepin county. At the intersection, highway No. 101 runs north and south, and Sixth avenue north runs east and west. Plaintiff testified that, accompanied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pearson v. NorellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Timmerman v. MarchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  3. Ernst v. Union City MissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Henjum v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kolatz v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Shockman v. Union Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Packar v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API