Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hillman v. Dubuclet

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1872No. 3494PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Eighth District Court, parish of Orleans. Dibble, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWyly, J.

The motion to dismiss the Appeal is refused.

The relator, alleging that he is the holder of $67,000 in State warrants on the general fund, avers that prior to this suit he “has brought suit both by injunction and by mandamus to retain money in the State treasury” to pay him; that ho again made demand upon the Stato Treasurer, requesting- him, “Antoine Dubuclet, to register the warrants of relatoras aforesaid, to the amount of $67,000, in a book in his office, to the end that the warrants of the relator may be accordingly paid out of the first moneys coming into the treasury to the credit of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Barataria Land Co. v. Louisiana Meadows Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. Edwards v. HayesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Bitting v. Red Hill Borough Council, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API