Legal Opinion

Border Brokerage Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 31, 1968No. C.D. 3270PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, Judge:

Plaintiff has filed protest contesting the classification of certain merchandise described in the entry invoices as galvanized conductor pipe elbows, liquidated by the collector as entered under TSUS item- 610.80, as iron or steel pipe fittings, not otherwise specified, dutiable at 19 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff claims that the pipe elbows are not pipe fittings but a form of iron or steel pipe dutiable at 10% per centum ad valorem under TSUS item 610.49. These pipe elbows are connecting bends used with the leaders and gutters one sees on the average home.

The competing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moller v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  2. L & B Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API