Legal Opinion
Rhoades v. Casey
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1999No. 97-20819PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Michael E. Casey appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Texas Savings and Loan Department. The appellant also challenges the district court’s order which distributed the disputed retirement benefits to other retirement plan participants, and the award of attorney’s fees to Plaintiff-Appellee Robert Rhoades. For the following reasons we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This appeal arises from a complicated set of factual and procedural circumstances. Michael E. Casey…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. MCorp Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Frank Lumpkin v. Envirodyne Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Anne P. Henry v. Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Tittle v. Enron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Robert Lee v. West Coast Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- MacK v. KuckenmeisterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Auto Parts Manufacturing Mississippi, Inc. v. King Construction of Houston, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. Moody Station and GroceryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.