Legal Opinion

Ehrlich v. Mills

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1948No. 16167PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

The plaintiff sued for injunction to restrain the defendants from trespassing upon a described tract of land claimed by the plaintiff. The answer of the defendants and the evidence introduced by both sides on the trial showed that the plaintiff and one of the defendants, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, owned adjoining tracts of land, and that the real matter in dispute was the true location of the boundary line. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial as amended was overruled, and he excepted. Held:

1. The court did…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Mims v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Christian v. Macon Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Thornton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. NewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kendrick v. KendrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
  2. Hooks v. THE STATESupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  3. Purcell v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  4. WILLIAMS v. HARVEYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
  5. Ivy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API