Ringolsby v. Johnson
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CRANFILL, District Judge.
[T1] Appellants Tracy L. Ringolsby and Jane E. Swanhorst appeal from the district court's order denying their claim for attorneys' fees. We conclude that Appellants are not entitled to attorneys' fees due to a failure of proof. We affirm.
ISSUES
[12] Appellants presented one issue for review as follows:
Whether the trial court abused its discretion by ruling that Appellants did not meet their burden of proving the reasonableness of their attorneys' fees where Appellants submitted redacted billing statements along with an offer of in camera review to the trial court.
Appell…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Martin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- UNC Teton Exploration Drilling, Inc. v. PeytonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- Hinckley v. HinckleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Goff v. GoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- State, Department of Family Services, Division of Public Assistance & Social Services Ex Rel. BJC v. DDMWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harold H. Dishman v. First Interstate BankWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Circle C Resources v. Charlene HasslerWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. Stacy E. Casper, Wsb No. 6-3431Wyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Elk Ridge Lodge, Inc. v. SonnettWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Christopher Ray CountsWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.