Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ochs v. Washington Heights Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1965Published

1Dissent

Valente, J. (dissenting).

Even assuming that petitioners, who are depositors in a Federal savings and loan association organized under the Home Owners’ Loan Act of 1933 (U. S. Code, tit. 12, § 1461 et seq.), may be treated as shareholders in a corporation and therefore entitled to a common-law right of inspection of the list of other depositors or members of the association, I cannot agree that petitioners should have been allowed such an inspection in the instant case without a preliminary trial as to their good faith.

It was held in Durnin v. Allentown Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. (218 F. Supp.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of SteinwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Daurelle v. Traders Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Durnin v. Allentown Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. State Ex Rel. Wicks v. Puget Sound Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Breswick & Co. v. Greater New York Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API