State Ex Rel. Olson v. City of Baraboo Joint Review Board

¶ 31. (dissenting). While I agree with the majority opinion's decision on the open meetings law, its identification of Wis. Stat. § 66.46(4m)(c)l (1997-98)1 as the statutory criteria that the Joint *647Review Board (JRB) must apply in its review of tax incremental district (TIF District) No. 6 and its conclusion that those criteria were reasonably applied by the JRB, I write in dissent because I conclude that Bartlett Olson did not waive his right to certiorari review of the common council's decision to include the costs of improvements lying outside of the geographic boundaries of TIF District…