Legal Opinion
(PC) Barksdale v. Juan
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 15, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02071Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES BARKSDALE, No. 2:19-cv-02071-CKD-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 JUAN, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this federal civil 18 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by 19 Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 I. Screening Standards 21 The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 22 governmental entity or officer or…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.