Legal Opinion
Reedy v. Pompa
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided March 18, 2010No. 13-08-00590-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice BENAVIDES.
In this interlocutory appeal, appellant, Wilma Reedy, R.N., appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion to dismiss under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 101.106(f) in favor of appel-lees, Elizabeth Pompa and Nicholas Pom-pa, III, as parents and next friends of Annica Pompa, a minor (collectively “the Pompas”). See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 101.106(f) (Vernon 2005); id. § 51.014(a)(5) (Vernon 2008) (authorizing an interlocutory appeal from an order that denies “a motion for summary judgment that is based on an assertion of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Mission Consolidated Independent School District v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- National Liability & Fire Insurance Co. v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Johnson v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Franka v. VelasquezTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Austin State Hospital v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Menefee v. KathrynCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Latisha McFadden v. Greg Oleskey, Rogelio Sanchez, Tamara Joseph, and Michael Pollard, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
- Illoh v. Carroll, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.