Latisha McFadden v. Greg Oleskey, Rogelio Sanchez, Tamara Joseph, and Michael Pollard
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. ALAN WALDROP, Justice.
Appellant Latisha McFadden, after being found not guilty on a criminal charge of assault on a police officer, filed suit against appellees Rogelio Sanchez, Greg Oleskey, Tamara Joseph, and Michael Pollard — the four police officers who procured her arrest. The district court granted ap-pellees’ plea to the jurisdiction and motion for summary judgment, and entered a take nothing judgment against McFadden. We affirm the judgment of the district court with respect to McFadden’s assault and false imprisonment claims, based on limitations. However, we conclude that…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Franka v. VelasquezTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- McFadden v. OleskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- KIT Projects, LLC v. PLT PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Franka v. VelasquezTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Latisha McFadden v. Greg Olesky and Rogelio Sanchez, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.