Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Anietra Young
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 20, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00559Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE Case No. 1:25-cv-00559-JLT-HBK COMPANY, 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE Plaintiff, SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK 13 OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION v. 14 FOURTEEN-DAY RESPONSE PERIOD ANIETRA YOUNG, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 This matter is before the Court sua sponte following a review of Plaintiff’s Motion for 19 Default Judgment (Doc. No. 11) and the Complaint (Doc. No. 1). Because this Court’s subject 20 matter jurisdiction is not clearly established on the face of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- In Re Balbir Singh Tuli, Debtor. Balbir Singh Tuli v. Republic of IraqCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Farmers Direct Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. MontezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025