Legal Opinion

Smith v. Chapman

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 27, 1976No. 2 CA-CIV 2190Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

If the evidence shows that the defendant, while under the influence of intoxicants, negligently drove his automobile in such a manner as to be a proximate cause of the collision with the plaintiff’s automobile, is the plaintiff entitled to (1) an instruction on punitive damages and (2) an instruction that contributory negligence is not a defense to gross negligence? The resolution of these issues is determinative of this appeal.

On the evening of October 27, 1972, a two-car collision between Patricia Smith and Ronald Ray Chapman occurred in the vicinity of the Cliff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Acheson v. ShafterArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Cano v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. City of Phoenix v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Durham v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. of CaliforniaArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Ross v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API