Porter v. Mitchell
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TOMARCUS PORTER CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 24-1127-JVM CODY MITCHELL, ET AL. ORDER Before the Court, on consent of the parties under the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Cody Mitchell, Jules Hebert, Connor Holmes, Dillon Tyne and Truly Dillon.1 Plaintiff Tomarcus Porter filed a response, a supplemental response and a second supplemental response in opposition to the motion.2 Having considered the memorandum, the record, and the applicable law, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted. I. Background…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Ragas v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.