Legal Opinion

Porter v. Mitchell

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 9, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01127Unknown

1Opinion

EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA TOMARCUS PORTER CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 24-1127-JVM CODY MITCHELL, ET AL. ORDER Before the Court, on consent of the parties under the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Cody Mitchell, Jules Hebert, Connor Holmes, Dillon Tyne and Truly Dillon.1 Plaintiff Tomarcus Porter filed a response, a supplemental response and a second supplemental response in opposition to the motion.2 Having considered the memorandum, the record, and the applicable law, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted. I. Background…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Ragas v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API