Legal Opinion
Thornock v. Kinderhill Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 22, 1989No. 88 Civ. 3978 (RWS), 88 Civ. 5848 (RWS), 88 Civ. 7901 (RWS)-88 Civ. 7903 (RWS)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Kinderhill Corporation and its associated limited partnerships (“Kind-erhill” or the “Kinderhill defendants”), Thomas A. Martin (“Martin”) and Jack R. Orben (“Orben”), and James F. Martin (“Martin”), Herman F. Borneman (“Bome-man”), Paul C. O’Neill (“O’Neill”), and John Wilson (“Wilson”) (the “outside directors”) have moved pursuant to 12(b)(6) to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,853 John Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,959 Frank Lanza, Jr. v. Drexel & Co., Theodore J. Kircher and Christie F. VitoloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re Blech Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Dietrich v. BauerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
- Three Crown Ltd. Partnership v. Caxton Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Citibank, N.A. v. K-H Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- In Re Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Research ReportsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.