SL Waber, Inc. v. American Power Conversion Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of plaintiff, SL Waber, Inc. (“Wa-ber”), to dismiss the counterclaim of defendant, American Power Conversion Corporation (“APC”), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), insofar as APC seeks a declaratory judgment that U.S.Patent No. 5,458,991 (“the ’991 patent”) is invalid, unenforceable and not infringed, and for leave to file an Amended Complaint, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), to delete its claim of infringement of the ’991 patent.
Because the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bp Chemicals Limited v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Spectronics Corporation v. H.B. Fuller Company, Inc., and H.B. Fuller Automotive Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Cambridge Products, Ltd., and Naremco, Inc. v. Penn Nutrients, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Capsa Solutions LLC v. Howard Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2026
- HUGO NEU CORPORATION v. FREEMAN FAMILY LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020