Legal Opinion

Leininger v. Minter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 29, 1929No. 19153PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REID, C.

As a taxpayer, Z. M. Minter, brought an injunction proceeding on September 29, 1927, to restrain the State Highway Commission of Oklahoma, and its members, from procuring- a policy of workmen’s compensation insurance covering persons working under the Commission, and further to restrain the Commission from using funds in its hands in payment of the premium on said policy.

Upon trial a permanent injunction was allowed, and the defendants appeal.

It appears from the record that pursuant to a resolution of authority passed by the Highway Commission, as it then stood on October 5, 1925, a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Menefee, State Treas. v. AskewSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. McCoy v. First Nat. Bank of ClevelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Smith v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  5. Butler v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ponca Salvage Iron & Metal Co. v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Coffee v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
  3. Coffee v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API