Legal Opinion
Kurtz v. Verizon New York, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 16, 2014No. Docket No. 13-3900-cvPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENNIS JACOBS, Circuit Judge:
New York allows telecommunications companies to exercise the state’s eminent domain powers to facilitate the construction and maintenance of telecommunications networks. Property owners are compensated by the company under the procedures outlined in state law. A putative plaintiff class alleges that Verizon installed multi-unit terminal boxes on their property without just compensation, and cites procedural due process violations in connection with the installation. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Irizarry, J.) dismissed the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Corsello v. Verizon New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Villager Pond, Inc. v. Town Of DarienCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- National Organization for Marriage, Inc. v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- James Edward Hoefling, Jr. v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Progressive Credit Union, Taxi Medallion Owner Driver Ass'n, Inc. v. City of N.Y.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Village Green at Sayville, LLC v. Town of IslipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Bloomingburg Jewish Education Center v. Village of BloomingburgDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Dean v. Town of HempsteadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.