Legal Opinion

Columbus McKinnon Corp. v. China Semiconductor Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided November 22, 1994No. 88-CV-0211E (F)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ELFVIN, District Judge.

Presently before this Court is a motion by third-party defendant Newman to dismiss the Third-Party Complaint of China Semiconductor Co, Ltd. (“CSC”) and, in the alternative, to request a more definite statement. For the reasons stated herein, Newman’s motion to dismiss will be granted. 1

Plaintiff Columbus McKinnon Corporation (“CM”) brought this diversity action against CSC in connection with CM’s efforts to develop the first computer-assisted hoist. CM is a New York corporation with its principal place of business in the Town of Amherst, N.Y. CSC is…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arthur D. Little International, Inc. v. Dooyang Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  2. Avazpour Networking Services, Inc. v. Falconstor Software, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  3. Bell Sports, Inc. v. System Software Associates, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  4. Racine County v. Oracular Milwaukee, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  5. Rapidigm Inc. v. ATM Management Services LLC, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API