Howmedica Osteonics Corp. v. Zimmer, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
This is a patent case. Plaintiffs-Appellants Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Ireland Ltd. (collectively, “Stryker”) appeal the district court’s final judgment. 1 The district court held that Defendants-Appellees Smith & Nephew, Inc. (“Smith”); Wright Medical Technology, Inc. (‘Wright”); and Zimmer, Inc. (“Zim-mer”) (collectively “Zimmer et al.”) did not infringe the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,475,243 (“'248 patent”). 2
The district court . granted summary judgment of non-infringement following claim construction. On appeal, Stryker contends that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Teva Pharm. United States, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Universal Secure Registry LLC v. Apple Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
- Frac Shack Inc. v. Fuel Automation Station, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2018
- B.E. Technology, LLC v. Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. Oz-Post Int'l, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Allergan USA, Inc. v. MSN Laboratories Private LimitedDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2021
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.